Matthew has a busy defence and prosecution practice in the Crown Court and Magistrates’ Court. He has experience across a range of offences including: dishonesty, drugs, domestic violence, motoring, sexual offences, firearms and fraud. Matthew is currently instructed in a number of Crown Court trials covering offences from malicious communications to weapons and assault offences.
Beyond general crime, Matthew has a keen interest in financial and white collar crime. He is currently instructed by a leading US law firm on a large scale multi-jurisdictional and multi-enforcement agency investigation into allegations of bribery and corruption. Matthew also has a developing prosecution knowledge of financial criminal investigations through his current instructions for the Serious Fraud Office advising on disclosure and relevance on a fraud and money laundering case.
Since Matthew started practising at the Bar, instructing solicitors have remarked that they “trust him to offer sound advice and build excellent rapport with clients”. Matthew has also earned praise from a senior circuit judge, being described as “confident, clear and concise...he is the sort of barrister judges welcome having before them, which can only be to the advantage of his clients”.
Whilst a pupil at 9BR Chambers, Matthew assisted senior members of chambers in a number of complex and high-profile cases, including: murders, serious sexual assaults, rape & multi-million-pound VAT fraud.
Prior to being called to the Bar Matthew served as an army infantry officer; service which included overseas operational deployments. Utilising this experience, he maintains a strong interest in areas of military law, court martial, as well as firearms cases and private firearms licensing appeals; recently delivering a webinar on firearms law and new Sentencing Council Guidelines on firearms offences.
Matthew has also worked in the front office of a tier 1 investment bank, in an FCA registered position. He is therefore well placed to develop his financial crime and regulatory practice.
Matthew has experience in presenting cases for the Nursing & Midwifery Council.
Prosecution counsel. Secured a conspiracy to burgle conviction after trial. Well organised group burglaries of multiple high-value residential properties throughout Surrey, Hampshire and Sussex. Trial involved adducing extensive cell site, mobile phone and ANPR data. Guildford Crown Court.
Robbery and attempted robbery sentence. Despite a sentencing categorisation with a start point of 4 years (range 3 – 6 years), alongside multiple aggravating factors, HHJ was persuaded to sentence significantly below the sentencing range, imposing a 2-year suspended sentence. Sentencing involved demanding issues relating to mental health and advice on vacating plea. Mitigation advocacy was described by HHJ as “really able”. Lewes Crown Court. News story here.
Plea and basis to handling stolen goods accepted on day one of domestic burglary and theft trial. Potential third strike domestic burglary sentence avoided. HHJ persuaded to sentence 20 months in custody. Wolverhampton Crown Court.
Five handed class B drugs production sentence. Basis accepted that the offending was lesser “gardener” role, despite evidence indicating potential for significant role. Client sentenced to 10 months. Norwich Crown Court.
Appeal to the Crown Court. Instructed as Prosecution Counsel, successfully resisted a defence appeal against conviction for using a mobile phone whilst driving. Isleworth Crown Court.
PWITS class B sentence. HHJ persuaded to sentence at bottom of SCGs to a 6-month SSO with no conditions, despite falling as significant role cat 3 on SCGs. Guildford Crown Court.
Special reasons hearing and sentence. Judge persuaded to sentence well below the SCGs to 5 penalty points and a £500 fine for driving 108 mph on a 60-mph road. Cheltenham Magistrates’ Court.
Mitigation for an aggravated burglary and two s20 GBH counts. Involved consideration and advice on complex basis of plea. PSR ordered to consider dangerousness. Offending fell at the top of the SCGs. Successfully avoided finding of dangerousness and a sentence below the top category SCGs start point. Sentence of 7 years 6 months. Inner London Crown Court.
Handling stolen goods trial. Cross examination of an officer on a voire dire, during trial, after Matthew identified continuity of evidence errors. Crown forced to offer no evidence after application to adjourn successfully opposed in light of previously unidentified evidence handling errors. Romford Youth Court.
Prosecution conviction secured in transphobic assault and criminal damage trial. Trial involved adducing evidence of multiple young and vulnerable witnesses and cross examination of young defendant. Special measures in place throughout. Maidstone Magistrates’ Court.
Stalking and breach of non-molestation order trial. Acquittal obtained on breach of non-molestation order after gaps in Crown’s evidence exposed during cross examination. Croydon Magistrates’ Court.
PROFILE: Matthew Simpson *
Regulatory / Disciplinary
0207 489 2727
University of Manchester, Politics & History – 1st Class BA (Hons)
Royal Military Academy Sandhurst
CFA (UK), Investment Management Certificate
BPP University, GDL – Commendation
University of Law, BPTC – Very Competent
BPTC James Crouch Scholar (Gray’s Inn)
Internship Award (Gray’s Inn)
Criminal Bar Association
South Eastern Circuit
Young Fraud Lawyers Association
CPS Panel (Grade 2)
NMC Case Presenter
ICCA “Advocacy and the Vulnerable Training Programme”
AG Civil “Junior Junior” Panel